Media, pop culture, news, trends, photos, rants + things we like.
Hello there! I'm Brian, your current tumblr. But we wouldn't be here without
this guy. Or this gal. BOTH OF WHOM NOW WORK AT TUMBLR! We're happy for them!
Perhaps check out our sister tumblrs: The Cheat Sheet! And NWK Archivist (your daily dose of gems from the Newsweek archives).
Send us an email. Ask us anything about life, love, & liberty.
Follow us on Tumblr!
Or follow our RSS, like a robot.
Or hey, visit Newsweek on the web! If you click on an ad there a wish might come true!
Did you see the image that ran on the front-page of the Los Angeles Times (and other newspapers) depicting the immediate aftermath of a suicide bombing in Afghanistan? It’s terrible. Readers are understandably upset, and many are criticizing the Times for subjecting them to such visual terror. You know where we stand on this, so we’ll spare you our take, but here’s Deputy Managing Editor Colin Crawford (who, the Times says, oversees the paper’s photography staff) explaining the decision:
We never run this type of image without discussions at the highest levels in the newsroom.
We understand that it is a tough image to look at, but we felt the news value of the photo made it worth publishing. We feel that we cannot hide important news from our readers, even when it is unpleasant.
The war in Afghanistan is an important and complicated story, and the violence seems to never end. In these attacks, the fact that it was sectarian violence adds yet another layer to the complexity of the situation.
The photo, while gut-wrenching, shows just how many innocents are being killed. The bodies of dead, maimed and wounded children breaks your heart but also lets you know how indiscriminate the killing has become.
Do you think the Times should have run this photo?
This was featured in #News